June 16, 2025
Four Acts of Deception: How Erin Patterson's Plan Unraveled
The player is loading ...
Crown Prosecutor Nanette Rogers delivers closing arguments in week eight of Erin Patterson's triple murder trial, outlining four alleged acts of deception in what the prosecution describes as a carefully planned poisoning. The defence maintains that the death cap mushroom poisonings were a tragic mistake, not intentional murder. • Prosecution claims Ms Patterson fabricated an ovarian cancer story to distract from her alleged murder plot • Individual beef wellingtons allegedly used to conceal...
Crown Prosecutor Nanette Rogers delivers closing arguments in week eight of Erin Patterson's triple murder trial, outlining four alleged acts of deception in what the prosecution describes as a carefully planned poisoning. The defence maintains that the death cap mushroom poisonings were a tragic mistake, not intentional murder.
• Prosecution claims Ms Patterson fabricated an ovarian cancer story to distract from her alleged murder plot
• Individual beef wellingtons allegedly used to conceal death cap mushrooms, deviating from traditional shared-log recipe
• Different coloured plate allegedly used by Ms Patterson to identify her safe, non-poisoned meal
• Patterson's claim about buying dried mushrooms from an unremembered Asian grocery store called "not believable"
• Prosecution argues Ms Patterson feigned illness after the lunch, with symptoms inconsistent with actual mushroom poisoning
• Location data suggests Patterson may have travelled to areas where death cap mushrooms grow
• Ian Wilkinson, the sole survivor, testified that Ms Patterson used a different coloured plate from other guests
• Alleged cover-up attempts include disposing of a dehydrator and concealing a mobile phone from investigators
Please visit mushroommurdertrial.com to subscribe to this podcast and our newsletter for exclusive updates, including previews of our upcoming book about this case. You can also support our work by buying us a coffee from $5, which helps cover editing, studio hire, insurance, and other production costs.
Instagram @Erin_Podcast
Twitter @lisapodcasts
Mushroom Murder Trial Website Facebook page
.
Erin Patterson Mushrooms
Here it is in summary.
WEBVTT
00:00:02.107 --> 00:00:02.988
Closing addresses.
00:00:02.988 --> 00:00:09.205
Today got underway in Erin Patterson's triple murder trial, which is now in its eighth can you believe it?
00:00:09.205 --> 00:00:12.714
Week in the Supreme Court of Victoria in Morwell.
00:00:12.714 --> 00:00:16.649
Hello and welcome to the Mushroom Murder Trial podcast.
00:00:16.649 --> 00:00:18.835
My name is Lisa.
00:00:18.835 --> 00:00:27.373
Before we launch into today's updates, please make sure you go to my website, mushroommurdertrialcom to subscribe.
00:00:27.373 --> 00:00:29.103
If you haven't yet.
00:00:29.103 --> 00:00:34.603
Please subscribe to this podcast on your preferred platform so you never miss an episode.
00:00:35.264 --> 00:00:48.890
Now getting back to Ms Patterson, the mother of two is pleading not guilty to murdering three relatives and the attempted murder of a fourth by serving them a beef wellington meal that contained poisonous death cat mushrooms.
00:00:48.890 --> 00:00:52.621
Ms Patterson's defence claims this was a tragic mistake.
00:00:52.621 --> 00:01:05.510
Now today, crown Prosecutor Nanette Rogers, sc told the court the Leon Gather woman had engaged in four substantial acts of deception while carrying out her alleged crimes.
00:01:05.510 --> 00:01:20.948
The prosecutor said the first of these was her allegedly fabricated ovarian cancer claim made to the lunch guests, devised as an elaborate cover to conceal the alleged poisoning plot.
00:01:20.948 --> 00:01:32.216
Dr Rogers said the 50-year-old fabricated a story about a potential cancer diagnosis in order to gain sympathy and to distract from her alleged motives.
00:01:32.216 --> 00:01:43.805
Dr Rogers argued that Ms Patterson went to considerable lengths to make the deception convincing, researching both brain and ovarian cancers.
00:01:43.805 --> 00:01:54.492
Why would she invent such a story, dr Rogers asked the jurors, because she'd never expected her guests to survive and reveal the lie.
00:01:54.492 --> 00:01:57.129
She believes it would die with them.
00:01:57.129 --> 00:02:04.328
Ms Patterson's claim that the lunch was meant as a thank you to her relatives and a showcase for her garden.
00:02:04.328 --> 00:02:09.683
As a thank you to her relatives and a showcase for her garden.
00:02:09.683 --> 00:02:15.622
Dr Rogers asserted that Ms Patterson had intentionally excluded her own children from the gathering to ensure they would not be harmed by the poisoned food.
00:02:16.506 --> 00:02:25.271
According to the prosecution, one of the most crucial aspects of the alleged deception was the way the toxic death cap mushrooms were concealed.
00:02:25.271 --> 00:02:42.008
Dr Rogers said Ms Patterson had allegedly deliberately placed death cap mushrooms inside individually prepared beef wellingtons, deviating from the traditional shared log-style version that's typically found in recipes.
00:02:42.008 --> 00:02:55.544
Dr Rogers said the intention behind the meal was deeply deceptive, Using what appeared to be a home-cooked lunch as a method for delivering a fatal dose of poison.
00:02:55.544 --> 00:03:15.122
The prosecution argued that the meal itself became the vehicle for harm by preparing the beef wellingtons as individual portions rather than the single log the beef wellingtons as individual portions rather than the single log, ms Patterson could make it seem as if she was eating the same meal while avoiding the poisoned servings.
00:03:15.122 --> 00:03:32.554
Dr Rogers added that, while no direct evidence pinpointed the exact source of the mushrooms, ms Patterson was known to use the iNaturalist website and had more than likely viewed entries specifically related to death cat mushrooms.
00:03:32.554 --> 00:03:44.460
Location data suggested she may have also travelled to areas such as Loch and Outram where the toxic fungi had previously been identified.
00:03:44.460 --> 00:03:56.621
A photo taken on one of her devices allegedly showed mushrooms on her kitchen bench which the prosecution argues were death caps.
00:03:57.423 --> 00:04:09.301
Dr Rogers also drew attention to testimony from Anne Wilkinson, the only survivor of the lunch, who said that Ms Patterson used a different coloured plate from the rest of the guests.
00:04:09.301 --> 00:04:16.500
The prosecution claimed this was a deliberate act allowing her to identify which meal was safe for her to eat.
00:04:16.500 --> 00:04:48.584
She separated her meal to avoid ingesting the poison she had added to the others, the court was told the prosecution challenged Ms Patterson's statement that she bought dried mushrooms for the meal from an Asian grocery store in several suburbs in Melbourne, pointing out that she had an unusually sharp memory throughout the trial, including recalling the specific days of past events, but could not remember which grocery store she went into.
00:04:48.584 --> 00:04:54.939
Dr Rogers questioned why Ms Patterson could not remember the location of this particular shop.
00:04:54.939 --> 00:05:03.423
She said that the claim is simply not believable and called it a falsehood that Ms Patterson repeated time and time again.
00:05:04.449 --> 00:05:10.310
A third major deceptive, according to the Crown, involved Ms Patterson pretending to be sick.
00:05:10.310 --> 00:05:21.283
After the lunch, dr Rogers told the jury that her symptoms did not match those of the poisoned guests and argued that this performance was staged to avoid suspicion.
00:05:21.283 --> 00:05:32.557
The only reason to feign illness was because she knew she hadn't consumed the toxic mushrooms and that appearing too healthy would raise the alarm.
00:05:32.557 --> 00:05:42.043
Simon Patterson, the accused estranged husband, testified that she told him she became unwell shortly after the guests left, experiencing diarrhea.
00:05:42.043 --> 00:06:16.526
However, dr Rogers highlighted that the actual victims only began showing symptoms around midnight, which aligned with the known timeline for death cap mushroom poisoning that's a medicine and pointed out how unlikely it was that someone suffering severe gastrointestinal symptoms would choose to take a two-hour drive from Leangatha the following day.
00:06:16.526 --> 00:06:24.374
Dr Rogers further alleged that Ms Patterson's decision to leave hospital before receiving treatment suggested guilty knowledge.
00:06:24.374 --> 00:06:28.221
Ms Patterson hadn't eaten the mushrooms.
00:06:28.221 --> 00:06:35.702
The jury was told she rushed home to figure out what to do next and how she would explain her relatively mild condition.
00:06:35.702 --> 00:06:46.721
As well as this, not one health worker in two hospitals and in an ambulance saw Erin Patterson being actually unwell.
00:06:46.721 --> 00:06:56.853
The prosecution concluded the day by introducing what it described as a fourth layer of deception, attempts to cover up what had occurred.
00:06:56.853 --> 00:07:05.274
Dr Rogers accused Ms Patterson of lying about feeding leftovers to her children and about the origin of the mushrooms used in the meal.
00:07:05.274 --> 00:07:13.536
She also claimed Ms Patterson discarded the dehydrator and concealed her regular mobile phone from investigators.
00:07:14.305 --> 00:07:20.158
The trial continues tomorrow and I will be back reporting for you then as well.
00:07:20.158 --> 00:07:22.653
So thank you so much for listening.
00:07:22.653 --> 00:07:26.574
For more information, go to my website mushroommurdertrialcom.
00:07:26.574 --> 00:07:46.904
Make sure you subscribe to my newsletter and my social media details they're in the show notes as well and if you feel like rewarding me for all the hours that I've put into this work, I would greatly appreciate it if you could buy me a coffee from $5 as a thank you, as some of you have.
00:07:46.904 --> 00:08:01.653
Thank you, sometimes I do spend it on Caramello Koalas, but I do spend it on editing, studio hire, liability insurance, sound voiceovers and there's exclusive membership material for you.
00:08:01.653 --> 00:08:10.615
But also, if you get on the newsletter I am going to be sharing with you guys first the beginnings of my book about this case.
00:08:11.204 --> 00:08:14.596
So get on there, it's something for free my newsletter.
00:08:14.596 --> 00:08:15.846
Why would you ever?
00:08:15.846 --> 00:08:19.254
My friend, mr Tony would say cheap is good.
00:08:19.254 --> 00:08:21.766
Why would you turn your back on something that's free?
00:08:21.766 --> 00:08:22.970
You just can't.
00:08:22.970 --> 00:08:31.653
So look, we're now in the final days of the Patterson case, so maybe this time next week we might have a verdict.
00:08:31.653 --> 00:08:33.537
We shall see.
00:08:33.537 --> 00:08:35.119
Thank you so much.
00:08:35.119 --> 00:08:36.746
Have a wonderful day.
00:08:36.746 --> 00:08:37.808
Bye.
00:00:02.107 --> 00:00:02.988
00:00:02.988 --> 00:00:09.205
00:00:09.205 --> 00:00:12.714
00:00:12.714 --> 00:00:16.649
00:00:16.649 --> 00:00:18.835
00:00:18.835 --> 00:00:27.373
00:00:27.373 --> 00:00:29.103
00:00:29.103 --> 00:00:34.603
00:00:35.264 --> 00:00:48.890
00:00:48.890 --> 00:00:52.621
00:00:52.621 --> 00:01:05.510
00:01:05.510 --> 00:01:20.948
00:01:20.948 --> 00:01:32.216
00:01:32.216 --> 00:01:43.805
00:01:43.805 --> 00:01:54.492
00:01:54.492 --> 00:01:57.129
00:01:57.129 --> 00:02:04.328
00:02:04.328 --> 00:02:09.683
00:02:09.683 --> 00:02:15.622
00:02:16.506 --> 00:02:25.271
00:02:25.271 --> 00:02:42.008
00:02:42.008 --> 00:02:55.544
00:02:55.544 --> 00:03:15.122
00:03:15.122 --> 00:03:32.554
00:03:32.554 --> 00:03:44.460
00:03:44.460 --> 00:03:56.621
00:03:57.423 --> 00:04:09.301
00:04:09.301 --> 00:04:16.500
00:04:16.500 --> 00:04:48.584
00:04:48.584 --> 00:04:54.939
00:04:54.939 --> 00:05:03.423
00:05:04.449 --> 00:05:10.310
00:05:10.310 --> 00:05:21.283
00:05:21.283 --> 00:05:32.557
00:05:32.557 --> 00:05:42.043
00:05:42.043 --> 00:06:16.526
00:06:16.526 --> 00:06:24.374
00:06:24.374 --> 00:06:28.221
00:06:28.221 --> 00:06:35.702
00:06:35.702 --> 00:06:46.721
00:06:46.721 --> 00:06:56.853
00:06:56.853 --> 00:07:05.274
00:07:05.274 --> 00:07:13.536
00:07:14.305 --> 00:07:20.158
00:07:20.158 --> 00:07:22.653
00:07:22.653 --> 00:07:26.574
00:07:26.574 --> 00:07:46.904
00:07:46.904 --> 00:08:01.653
00:08:01.653 --> 00:08:10.615
00:08:11.204 --> 00:08:14.596
00:08:14.596 --> 00:08:15.846
00:08:15.846 --> 00:08:19.254
00:08:19.254 --> 00:08:21.766
00:08:21.766 --> 00:08:22.970
00:08:22.970 --> 00:08:31.653
00:08:31.653 --> 00:08:33.537
00:08:33.537 --> 00:08:35.119
00:08:35.119 --> 00:08:36.746
00:08:36.746 --> 00:08:37.808
